Robot-assisted mapping of chemical reaction hyperspaces and networks
Skoraczyński, G. et al. Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient? Sci. Rep. 7, 3582 (2017).
Google Scholar
Saebi, M. et al. On the use of real-world datasets for reaction yield prediction. Chem. Sci. 14, 4997–5005 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Moroz, Y. S. & Isayev, O. The challenge of balancing model sensitivity and robustness in predicting yields: a benchmarking study of amide coupling reactions. Chem. Sci. 14, 10835–10846 (2023).
Google Scholar
Szymkuć, S., Wołos, A., Roszak, R. & Grzybowski, B. A. Estimation of multicomponent reactions’ yields from networks of mechanistic steps. Nat. Commun. 15, 10286 (2024).
Google Scholar
Restrepo, G. Spaces of mathematical chemistry. Theory Biosci. 143, 237–251 (2024).
Google Scholar
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D. L. & Cronin, L. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature 559, 377–381 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, S. et al. Mapping the dark space of chemical reactions with extended nanomole synthesis and MALDI-TOF MS. Science 361, eaar6236 (2018).
Google Scholar
Coley, C. W. et al. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science 365, eaax1566 (2019).
Google Scholar
Angello, N. H. et al. Closed-loop optimization of general reaction conditions for heteroaryl Suzuki-Miyaura coupling. Science 378, 399–405 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rohrbach, S. et al. Digitization and validation of a chemical synthesis literature database in the ChemPU. Science 377, 172–180 (2022).
Google Scholar
Slattery, A. et al. Automated self-optimization, intensification, and scale-up of photocatalysis in flow. Science 383, eadj1817 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dai, T. et al. Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry. Nature 635, 890–897 (2024).
Google Scholar
Buitrago Santanilla, A. et al. Nanomole-scale high-throughput chemistry for the synthesis of complex molecules. Science 347, 49–53 (2015).
Google Scholar
Davies, I. W. The digitization of organic synthesis. Nature 570, 175–181 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shields, B. J. et al. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590, 89–96 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wilbraham, L., Mehr, S. H. M. & Cronin, L. Digitizing chemistry using the chemical processing unit: from synthesis to discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 253–262 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mahjour, B. et al. Rapid planning and analysis of high-throughput experiment arrays for reaction discovery. Nat. Commun. 14, 3924 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. Y. et al. Identifying general reaction conditions by bandit optimization. Nature 626, 1025–1033 (2024).
Google Scholar
Strieth-Kalthoff, F. et al. Artificial intelligence for retrosynthetic planning needs both data and expert knowledge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 11005–11017 (2024).
Google Scholar
Stadler, E. et al. A versatile method for the determination of photochemical quantum yields via online UV-Vis spectroscopy. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 17, 660–669 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lu, J.-M. et al. Roboticized AI-assisted microfluidic photocatalytic synthesis and screening up to 10,000 reactions per day. Nat. Commun. 15, 8826 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bioucas-Dias, J. M. et al. Hyperspectral unmixing overview: geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 5, 354–379 (2012).
Google Scholar
Banert, K. & Kurnianto, A. Nucleophile substitution bei 4,4-dimethyl-2-adamantyl-substraten: rückseitenangriff bei 2-adamantan-derivaten. Chem. Ber. 119, 3826–3841 (1986).
Google Scholar
Thibblin, A. & Sidhu, H. Mechanisms of competing solvolytic elimination and substitution reactions. The role of ion-pair intermediates in aqueous solvents. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2, 1423–1428 (1994).
Google Scholar
Clennan, E. L. Aromatic endoperoxides. Photochem. Photobiol. 99, 204–220 (2023).
Google Scholar
Klaper, M., Wessig, P. & Linker, T. Base catalysed decomposition of anthracene endoperoxide. Chem. Commun. 52, 1210–1213 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ammer, J., Sailer, C. F., Riedle, E. & Mayr, H. Photolytic generation of benzhydryl cations and radicals from quaternary phosphonium salts: how highly reactive carbocations survive their first nanoseconds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 11481–11494 (2012).
Google Scholar
Nishimae, Y., Kurata, H. & Oda, M. Arylbis(9-anthryl)methyl cations: highly crowded, near infrared light absorbing hydrocarbon cations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 4947–4950 (2004).
Google Scholar
Nojima, M., Takagi, M., Morinaga, M., Nagao, G. & Tokura, N. Reaction of some triarylmethyl radicals, polyarylalkenes, and 9,10-dihydro-9,10-epidioxyanthracenes with sulphur dioxide; detection of radicals and/or cations derived from the corresponding cation radicals. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 5, 488–495 (1978).
Google Scholar
Hollenstein, S. & Laali, K. K. Efficient conversion of 9-isopropenylphenanthrene to 4,6,6-trimethyl-6H-benz[de]anthracene in FSO3H; 5,6-dihydro-4H-benzanthracen-4-ium ion and its charge delocalization mode. Chem. Commun. 2145–2146 (1997).
Cankařová, N., Nemec, I. & Krchňák, V. p-TSA-mediated four-component reaction: one-step access to mesoionic 1H-imidazol-3-ium-4-olates, direct NHC precursors. Adv. Synth. Catal. 364, 2996–3003 (2022).
Google Scholar
Medeiros, G. A. et al. Probing the mechanism of the Ugi four-component reaction with charge-tagged reagents by ESI-MS(/MS). Chem. Commun. 50, 338–340 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rocha, R. O., Rodrigues, M. O. & Neto, B. A. D. Review on the Ugi multicomponent reaction mechanism and the use of fluorescent derivatives as functional chromophores. ACS Omega 5, 972–979 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alvim, H. G. O., da Silva Júnior, E. N. & Neto, B. A. D. What do we know about multicomponent reactions? Mechanisms and trends for the Biginelli, Hantzsch, Mannich, Passerini and Ugi MCRs. RSC Adv. 4, 54282–54299 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chéron, N., Ramozzi, R., Kaïm, L. E., Grimaud, L. & Fleurat-Lessard, P. Challenging 50 years of established views on Ugi reaction: a theoretical approach. J. Org. Chem. 77, 1361–1366 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hantzsch, A. Condensationsprodukte aus Aldehydammoniak und ketonartigen Verbindungen. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 14, 1637–1638 (1881).
Google Scholar
Shen, L. et al. A revisit to the Hantzsch reaction: unexpected products beyond 1,4-dihydropyridines. Green Chem. 11, 1414–1420 (2009).
Google Scholar
Santos, V. G. et al. The multicomponent Hantzsch reaction: comprehensive mass spectrometry monitoring using charge-tagged reagents. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 12808–12816 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chang, C.-C. et al. Antagonism of 4-substituted 1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylates toward voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels CaV1.3 and CaV1.2. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18, 3147–3158 (2010).
Google Scholar
Petrenko-Kritschenko, P. Über die kondensation des acetondicarbonsäureesters mit aldehyden, ammoniak und aminen. J. Prakt. Chem. 85, 1–37 (1912).
Google Scholar
Singh, B. & Indra, A. Prussian blue- and Prussian blue analogue-derived materials: progress and prospects for electrochemical energy conversion. Mater. Today Energy 16, 100404 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Chemical properties, structural properties, and energy storage applications of Prussian blue analogues. Small 15, 1900470 (2019).
Google Scholar
Choo, J. P. S. & Li, Z. Styrene oxide isomerase catalyzed Meinwald rearrangement reaction: discovery and application in single-step and one-pot cascade reactions. Org. Process Res. Dev. 26, 1960–1970 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guo, S. et al. Synthesis of trimetallic Prussian blue analogues and catalytic application for the epoxidation of styrene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 13831–13840 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liang, Y. et al. Prussian blue analogues as heterogeneous catalysts for epoxidation of styrene. RSC Adv. 5, 17993–17999 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., He, X., Zhang, F. & Zhang, Z. Regulation of the products of styrene oxidation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 120, 171–178 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pal, A. et al. Finding thermodynamically favorable pathways in chemical reaction networks using flows in hypergraphs and mixed-integer linear programming. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 65, 6772–6787 (2025).
Grzybowski, B. A., Bishop, K. J. M., Kowalczyk, B. & Wilmer, C. E. The ‘wired’ universe of organic chemistry. Nat. Chem. 1, 31–36 (2009).
Google Scholar
Krzeszewski, M. et al. Computer-generated, mechanistic networks assist in assigning the outcomes of complex multicomponent reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 15636–15644 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mikulak-Klucznik, B., Klucznik, T., Beker, W., Moskal, M. & Grzybowski, B. A. Catalyst: curtailing the scalable supply of fentanyl by using chemical AI. Chem 10, 1319–1326 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mahjour, B., Shen, Y., Liu, W. & Cernak, T. A map of the amine–carboxylic acid coupling system. Nature 580, 71–75 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baltussen, M. G., de Jong, T. J., Duez, Q., Robinson, W. E. & Huck, W. T. S. Chemical reservoir computation in a self-organizing reaction network. Nature 631, 549–555 (2024).
Google Scholar
Seelig, G., Soloveichik, D., Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits. Science 314, 1585–1588 (2006).
Google Scholar
Daniel, R., Rubens, J. R., Sarpeshkar, R. & Lu, T. K. Synthetic analog computation in living cells. Nature 497, 619–623 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wołos, A. et al. Computer-designed repurposing of chemical wastes into drugs. Nature 604, 668–676 (2022).
Google Scholar
Halder, J. et al. Insight of solvent effect on CeO2 catalyzed oxidation of styrene with tert-butyl hydroperoxide: a combined experimental and theoretical approach. Catal. Commun. 164, 106413 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jia, Y. et al. Code and raw data for ‘Robot-assisted mapping of chemical reaction hyperspaces and networks’. Zenodo (2025).
Schroeder, W., Martin, K. & Lorensen, B. The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-oriented Approach to 3D Graphics 4th edn (Kitware, 2006).
Goodman, J. & Weare, J. Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 5, 65–80 (2010).
Google Scholar
Branch, M. A., Coleman, T. F. & Li, Y. A subspace, interior, and conjugate gradient method for large-scale bound-constrained minimization problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 1–23 (1999).
Google Scholar
Du, M. et al. High‐entropy Prussian blue analogues and their oxide family as sulfur hosts for lithium‐sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202209350 (2022).
Google Scholar
link
.jpg "IFW Dresden selects Agnitron Agilis 100 MOCVD platform for precursor chemistry and ultra-wide-bandgap materials development")